Grazie Sophia Christie, editor and writer of The Cut, a website established by New York magazine, was a third-year student at Harvard School at the age of 20. At that time, she realized that she could learn carefully through years of work and hard work, diligently pursue her "ideal existence", or she could "get married early".
Christy chose the latter.
She praised the value of marrying an older and rich man in her column articles, and believed that this was a shortcut to her ideal life. This article, published on March 27, exploded online, becoming the top of the magazine's "Most Popular" list, and attracted hundreds of negative comments on websites and social media, just like "Miami New" Times described, "This article has caused a lot of revelations online and has been heard by the whole world."
{9 99}The reader was shocked by all aspects of Christie's nearly 4,000-word Wilson article. When she was still a college student, Christie pulled a heavy box of books to Harvard Business School every Saturday. She thought that was the best choice for a suitable partner. "I have high breasts, fertility, flat horsetails, and not exhausted enough vitality. Older men still long for these characteristics."
She participated in a Harvard Business School event, met her future husband at the age of 20, and married four years later.
What shocked many readers was that Christie benefited from elite education and even completed researcher work at Oxford University, but she pursued an unequal marriage. Christie's article reads: "My husband is not my partner, he is my supervisor and my lover. Only in some cases, he is my friend."
When I entered the ceremony lightly, Christie was able to work far away from a wealthy but dull office, working as a full-time job, but I don't have to live a hard life like a writer.
This article that has caused a lot of controversy is an ostensible marriage of age, but netizens pointed out that the title of the article should be "an example of marrying a rich man."
Christy's trading attitude towards marriage has caused readers' negative faces. Some netizens commented that Christy's article was "an insult to women of all ages", "a sad article" and "a bad in many ways". Some readers wondered whether this article was a thorn or a joke. A more friendly commentary said: "This is one of the most embarrassing content I have read, and I am really embarrassed for the author."